Japan’s Shift to Responsible Fiscal Expansion Reshapes Bond Market Outlook
As Japan’s policy agenda shifts, its emphasis on “responsible fiscal expansion” is beginning to influence the behavior of its bond market.
After years defined by extremely low yields and persistent deflation, the Japanese government bond (JGB) market is becoming more active. Yields, which had been gradually climbing through spring and summer, jumped sharply in September and October as investors reacted to a change in political leadership. For the first time in decades, certain long-term JGB metrics—such as the 20-year forward 10-year rate—now surpass equivalent US Treasury yields.
A Noticeable Rise in JGB Yields
This rise is about more than shifting interest-rate expectations; it reflects a larger transition in Japan’s political and economic mindset. In the July elections, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party lost its majority in both chambers, while parties advocating more aggressive fiscal spending gained momentum.
Japan’s new prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, has long supported policies aimed at stimulating growth and has questioned the Bank of Japan’s recent tightening efforts. Her administration’s focus on “responsible fiscal expansion” is not just branding—it represents a meaningful change in how the country views public debt and economic strategy.
A New Fiscal Framework
For roughly twenty years, Japan’s fiscal policy has been guided by its primary-balance rule, which sought to keep government revenues aligned with non-interest expenditures. In reality, this goal was never achieved, and public debt continued to rise.
The latest approach, outlined by Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama, introduces a more flexible model that looks at the relationship between economic growth and borrowing costs. The principle is simple: if the economy grows faster than the interest Japan pays on its debt, the debt burden remains manageable—even if moderate deficits persist.
This marks a shift away from strict accounting metrics toward a broader view of long-term fiscal sustainability. The goal isn’t to abandon discipline but to adapt it to an environment where inflation and nominal growth have finally returned.
A Moment of Opportunity
Post-pandemic conditions have changed Japan’s fiscal landscape. Global inflation pressures and a weaker yen have pushed up nominal GDP and domestic prices.
Even with this year’s rise in yields, government financing costs are still relatively low, allowing Tokyo to increase spending on growth initiatives and social programs without immediately straining its finances.
For the first time in many years, economic growth meaningfully exceeds the cost of borrowing—a rare period that makes a more proactive fiscal stance viable. This doesn’t open the door to unlimited spending, but it does give Japan the ability to use fiscal tools more confidently than it has in decades.
What This Means for Investors
These policy changes carry clear implications for bond markets. With the BoJ raising rates and reducing its role as a major buyer of JGBs—and with domestic insurers pulling back from ultra-long maturities—upward pressure has concentrated at the long end of the curve. Thirty-year JGB yields have climbed nearly a full percentage point since the start of the year.
On the upside, a steeper and more active yield curve brings back some of the return potential and volatility that global investors have long missed in Japan. This creates more room for diversification and tactical opportunities across maturities.
Japan’s evolving stance could also influence broader debates in other advanced economies. The idea that growth can offset moderate deficits when borrowing costs are contained resonates with ongoing discussions in Europe and the US about post-pandemic fiscal priorities.
What Could Go Wrong?
The success of this strategy hinges on one crucial condition: nominal growth must stay higher than interest rates. A sharp round of monetary tightening from the BoJ or a global recession could quickly undermine that balance. If economic momentum slows or borrowing costs rise too quickly, Japan’s debt path could start to worsen again.
Still, today’s environment looks very different from the long deflationary slump of earlier decades. Inflation expectations are more stable, companies are in stronger financial shape, and wage growth—while not rapid—is improving. Japan has a genuine opportunity, provided policy remains credible and temporary stimulus does not evolve into chronic overspending.
A Careful Recalibration
Japan’s new fiscal direction is more than a political shift—it signals a broader reassessment of how growth, inflation, and public debt interact in a mature economy. By adopting “responsible fiscal expansion,” policymakers are wagering that increased flexibility will support, rather than weaken, long-term stability.
For investors, tracking the gap between economic growth and bond yields—rather than focusing solely on deficit numbers—will be essential in gauging Japan’s bond outlook and, potentially, the future direction of global interest-rate dynamics.
The opinions expressed are not investment advice or research recommendations and may not reflect the views of all AB portfolio managers. They are subject to change over time.
After years defined by extremely low yields and persistent deflation, the Japanese government bond (JGB) market is becoming more active. Yields, which had been gradually climbing through spring and summer, jumped sharply in September and October as investors reacted to a change in political leadership. For the first time in decades, certain long-term JGB metrics—such as the 20-year forward 10-year rate—now surpass equivalent US Treasury yields.
A Noticeable Rise in JGB Yields
This rise is about more than shifting interest-rate expectations; it reflects a larger transition in Japan’s political and economic mindset. In the July elections, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party lost its majority in both chambers, while parties advocating more aggressive fiscal spending gained momentum.
Japan’s new prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, has long supported policies aimed at stimulating growth and has questioned the Bank of Japan’s recent tightening efforts. Her administration’s focus on “responsible fiscal expansion” is not just branding—it represents a meaningful change in how the country views public debt and economic strategy.
A New Fiscal Framework
For roughly twenty years, Japan’s fiscal policy has been guided by its primary-balance rule, which sought to keep government revenues aligned with non-interest expenditures. In reality, this goal was never achieved, and public debt continued to rise.
The latest approach, outlined by Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama, introduces a more flexible model that looks at the relationship between economic growth and borrowing costs. The principle is simple: if the economy grows faster than the interest Japan pays on its debt, the debt burden remains manageable—even if moderate deficits persist.
This marks a shift away from strict accounting metrics toward a broader view of long-term fiscal sustainability. The goal isn’t to abandon discipline but to adapt it to an environment where inflation and nominal growth have finally returned.
A Moment of Opportunity
Post-pandemic conditions have changed Japan’s fiscal landscape. Global inflation pressures and a weaker yen have pushed up nominal GDP and domestic prices.
Even with this year’s rise in yields, government financing costs are still relatively low, allowing Tokyo to increase spending on growth initiatives and social programs without immediately straining its finances.
For the first time in many years, economic growth meaningfully exceeds the cost of borrowing—a rare period that makes a more proactive fiscal stance viable. This doesn’t open the door to unlimited spending, but it does give Japan the ability to use fiscal tools more confidently than it has in decades.
What This Means for Investors
These policy changes carry clear implications for bond markets. With the BoJ raising rates and reducing its role as a major buyer of JGBs—and with domestic insurers pulling back from ultra-long maturities—upward pressure has concentrated at the long end of the curve. Thirty-year JGB yields have climbed nearly a full percentage point since the start of the year.
On the upside, a steeper and more active yield curve brings back some of the return potential and volatility that global investors have long missed in Japan. This creates more room for diversification and tactical opportunities across maturities.
Japan’s evolving stance could also influence broader debates in other advanced economies. The idea that growth can offset moderate deficits when borrowing costs are contained resonates with ongoing discussions in Europe and the US about post-pandemic fiscal priorities.
What Could Go Wrong?
The success of this strategy hinges on one crucial condition: nominal growth must stay higher than interest rates. A sharp round of monetary tightening from the BoJ or a global recession could quickly undermine that balance. If economic momentum slows or borrowing costs rise too quickly, Japan’s debt path could start to worsen again.
Still, today’s environment looks very different from the long deflationary slump of earlier decades. Inflation expectations are more stable, companies are in stronger financial shape, and wage growth—while not rapid—is improving. Japan has a genuine opportunity, provided policy remains credible and temporary stimulus does not evolve into chronic overspending.
A Careful Recalibration
Japan’s new fiscal direction is more than a political shift—it signals a broader reassessment of how growth, inflation, and public debt interact in a mature economy. By adopting “responsible fiscal expansion,” policymakers are wagering that increased flexibility will support, rather than weaken, long-term stability.
For investors, tracking the gap between economic growth and bond yields—rather than focusing solely on deficit numbers—will be essential in gauging Japan’s bond outlook and, potentially, the future direction of global interest-rate dynamics.
The opinions expressed are not investment advice or research recommendations and may not reflect the views of all AB portfolio managers. They are subject to change over time.
Companies