Rewiring Healthcare: Building Patient-Centered, Future-Ready Systems
Across the globe, health systems are falling short. From Dhaka to Nairobi to Detroit, most were originally designed for acute care and structured to serve institutions—governments, hospitals, and insurers—rather than the people who rely on them. Attempts to digitize these systems consistently run into the same barrier: an outdated and unsustainable design. While these setups may work during emergencies, they fail when it comes to supporting long-term health needs.
Throwing more money or advanced tools, including AI, at the problem will not fix a flawed foundation. The real issue is not technology, but the underlying architecture.
Rewired healthcare focuses on building systems around people, not patching them for institutions. The future demands frameworks designed to deliver outcomes that matter—longer, healthier lives at lower costs—while using technology in a smarter, more integrated way.
Rashida’s Story
Take Rashida, a pregnant woman living in a village near Dhaka. She has diabetes and her husband is recovering from tuberculosis. Despite these risks, she has little knowledge of her health status or treatment options. Occasionally, a community health worker visits her, but her care is divided across three separate programs: maternal health, noncommunicable diseases, and TB.
Individually, these programs function. Together, they fail. Her diabetes medication isn’t reviewed for pregnancy safety, her antenatal record isn’t visible across systems, and her household TB risk is ignored. This results in incomplete, fragmented care. The health worker struggles to manage disconnected protocols, focusing more on reporting than outcomes. Rashida’s expenses mount, her records don’t follow her, and local administrators see only partial information, limiting their ability to allocate resources effectively.
This siloed approach—rigid, isolated, and resistant to adaptation—creates fragmentation. Simply digitizing existing processes or adding AI on top will only magnify the complexity. What’s required is an intentional redesign of health architecture, powered by technology.
From Fragmentation to Flow
Healthcare today is fractured into rigid blocks: vertical programs, disconnected community and facility services, hospitals segmented by departments, separate public-private systems, and insurers defining narrow coverage. Each block bundles services, protocols, and data into inflexible silos.
To create flow, these blocks must be broken down into functional components: discovery, navigation, diagnosis, planning, treatment, monitoring, and prevention. Each can operate as modular services delivered at the right time and place for patients. With technology, these modules can be recombined to maximize efficiency and outcomes.
For Rashida, this would mean:
Throwing more money or advanced tools, including AI, at the problem will not fix a flawed foundation. The real issue is not technology, but the underlying architecture.
Rewired healthcare focuses on building systems around people, not patching them for institutions. The future demands frameworks designed to deliver outcomes that matter—longer, healthier lives at lower costs—while using technology in a smarter, more integrated way.
Rashida’s Story
Take Rashida, a pregnant woman living in a village near Dhaka. She has diabetes and her husband is recovering from tuberculosis. Despite these risks, she has little knowledge of her health status or treatment options. Occasionally, a community health worker visits her, but her care is divided across three separate programs: maternal health, noncommunicable diseases, and TB.
Individually, these programs function. Together, they fail. Her diabetes medication isn’t reviewed for pregnancy safety, her antenatal record isn’t visible across systems, and her household TB risk is ignored. This results in incomplete, fragmented care. The health worker struggles to manage disconnected protocols, focusing more on reporting than outcomes. Rashida’s expenses mount, her records don’t follow her, and local administrators see only partial information, limiting their ability to allocate resources effectively.
This siloed approach—rigid, isolated, and resistant to adaptation—creates fragmentation. Simply digitizing existing processes or adding AI on top will only magnify the complexity. What’s required is an intentional redesign of health architecture, powered by technology.
From Fragmentation to Flow
Healthcare today is fractured into rigid blocks: vertical programs, disconnected community and facility services, hospitals segmented by departments, separate public-private systems, and insurers defining narrow coverage. Each block bundles services, protocols, and data into inflexible silos.
To create flow, these blocks must be broken down into functional components: discovery, navigation, diagnosis, planning, treatment, monitoring, and prevention. Each can operate as modular services delivered at the right time and place for patients. With technology, these modules can be recombined to maximize efficiency and outcomes.
For Rashida, this would mean:
- An AI assistant in Bangla answers her questions, screens for risks, and books her next appointment.
- A health worker uses a single tool to deliver care, seamlessly syncing everything into her record.
- Prescriptions are checked for safety, linked to pharmacies, and managed transparently.
- She receives reminders, proactive outreach for abnormal readings, and continuity across antenatal, newborn, and postpartum care.
- Dashboards give administrators a full, real-time picture of needs, supplies, and outcomes.
Financing would shift to reward prevention and coordinated care instead of fragmented, crisis-driven interventions.
This is healthcare rewired: a single patient record, a unified care plan, and a financial system aligned with outcomes.
The Leapfrog Opportunity
Other industries have already undergone similar transformations. Banking once kept loans, savings, and payments separate, but now integrates them seamlessly around the customer. Telecoms did the same with voice, data, and messaging. Healthcare, however, has resisted change—caught between outdated monoliths and fragmented add-ons.
It’s often assumed that low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) cannot afford to rebuild systems. In fact, they may be better positioned to leapfrog because they are less entrenched in legacy infrastructure. With a clean slate, LMICs can design digital, patient-centric systems from the ground up.
So far, most efforts have produced patchy solutions: fragmented apps, partial registries, siloed dashboards, and scattered AI tools. The result is brittle—data doesn’t flow, workflows overlap, and guidance remains locked in manuals. Interoperability helps systems connect, but it alone cannot create a strong foundation.
True transformation requires a shared infrastructure layer. Beyond health IDs and registries, systems need core building blocks: patient profiles, workflow engines, knowledge libraries, payment rails, and app interfaces. Managed under open standards, these elements allow services to be modularized and then rebuilt around patient journeys.
Such systems are resilient, scalable, and future-ready. They make data central to care, streamline workflows, embed knowledge in every interaction, and tie payments to real outcomes.
Testing a Rewired Health System
How do we measure success? A rewired system should be judged on three simple criteria:
This is healthcare rewired: a single patient record, a unified care plan, and a financial system aligned with outcomes.
The Leapfrog Opportunity
Other industries have already undergone similar transformations. Banking once kept loans, savings, and payments separate, but now integrates them seamlessly around the customer. Telecoms did the same with voice, data, and messaging. Healthcare, however, has resisted change—caught between outdated monoliths and fragmented add-ons.
It’s often assumed that low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) cannot afford to rebuild systems. In fact, they may be better positioned to leapfrog because they are less entrenched in legacy infrastructure. With a clean slate, LMICs can design digital, patient-centric systems from the ground up.
So far, most efforts have produced patchy solutions: fragmented apps, partial registries, siloed dashboards, and scattered AI tools. The result is brittle—data doesn’t flow, workflows overlap, and guidance remains locked in manuals. Interoperability helps systems connect, but it alone cannot create a strong foundation.
True transformation requires a shared infrastructure layer. Beyond health IDs and registries, systems need core building blocks: patient profiles, workflow engines, knowledge libraries, payment rails, and app interfaces. Managed under open standards, these elements allow services to be modularized and then rebuilt around patient journeys.
Such systems are resilient, scalable, and future-ready. They make data central to care, streamline workflows, embed knowledge in every interaction, and tie payments to real outcomes.
Testing a Rewired Health System
How do we measure success? A rewired system should be judged on three simple criteria:
- Outcomes: Are patients healthier? Can they access, afford, and complete effective care? Do they trust the system?
- Data: Is information being used at every level to improve outcomes and efficiency?
- Cost: Are we paying for real health results rather than just episodes of care? Can we lower overall costs while improving population health?
Currently, in most places, the answers to these questions are “no.” A rewired system would make each one a design principle.
The Bottom Line
Our current health systems are built on flawed architecture. To move forward, we must ask: “If we were designing healthcare today, for the people it is meant to serve, what would it look like?”
The answer isn’t layering more apps or AI on top of broken systems. It’s building a modular, patient-centered model that can learn, evolve, and deliver better outcomes.
It’s time to build that system. It’s time to rewire healthcare.
The Bottom Line
Our current health systems are built on flawed architecture. To move forward, we must ask: “If we were designing healthcare today, for the people it is meant to serve, what would it look like?”
The answer isn’t layering more apps or AI on top of broken systems. It’s building a modular, patient-centered model that can learn, evolve, and deliver better outcomes.
It’s time to build that system. It’s time to rewire healthcare.
Companies