Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (KSF), along with its partner Charles C. Foti Jr., has alerted investors of Navan, Inc about a securities class action lawsuit filed against the company.

Class Definition
The legal action aims to recover losses for investors who purchased Navan shares through or traceable to the Registration Statement and Prospectus (together referred to as the “Offering Documents”) issued for the company’s October 2025 initial public offering (IPO). Individuals seeking additional details or wishing to speak with a member of the legal team can visit: https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nasdaqgs-navn/

Navan investors may also reach out to KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn by calling 1-877-515-1850 or emailing lewis.kahn@ksfcounsel.com for further information about the case.

Case Details
The complaint alleges that Navan and certain company executives failed to disclose important information in the Offering Documents, potentially breaching federal securities laws. Specifically, the filing claims that the documents omitted or misrepresented key facts, including a substantial rise in the company’s “sales and marketing” expenses. For the quarter ending October 31, 2025, those costs reportedly climbed to nearly $95 million—an increase of about 39% compared with $68.5 million recorded in the quarter ending July 31, 2025. According to the lawsuit, once this information became public, Navan’s share price dropped significantly.

The case is titled McCown v. Navan, Inc., Case No. 26-cv-01550.

Next Steps for Investors
Investors who bought Navan securities during the relevant period and experienced financial losses have until April 24, 2026 to ask the court to appoint them as the lead plaintiff. Participation in any potential settlement or recovery, however, does not require serving in that role.

Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”), along with firm partner and former Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr., has informed investors in Kyndryl Holdings, Inc about a securities class action lawsuit filed on behalf of shareholders.

Class Definition
The lawsuit aims to recover financial losses for investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Kyndryl securities and were allegedly harmed by suspected securities fraud between August 7, 2024, and February 9, 2026. Additional information about the case is available at: https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nyse-kd/

Investors seeking further details can contact KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn at 1-877-515-1850, send an email to lewis.kahn@ksfcounsel.com .

Case Background
On February 9, 2026, Kyndryl revealed that it would not be able to submit its Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2025 on time. The company also indicated that it expects to report significant weaknesses in its internal financial reporting controls. These issues are anticipated to affect the period covered by the upcoming quarterly report, the full fiscal year ending March 31, 2025, and the first two quarters of fiscal year 2026. The concerns may involve deficiencies in certain corporate functions, including information and communication controls and leadership oversight (“tone at the top”). The announcement also included news of the departures of the company’s Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel.

Following this disclosure, Kyndryl’s stock price dropped sharply, falling $12.90 per share—about 55%—to close at $10.59 on February 9, 2026.

The case is titled Brander v. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 26-cv-00782.

Next Steps for Investors
Individuals who invested in Kyndryl during the specified period and experienced financial losses may apply to the court to serve as lead plaintiff by April 13, 2026. However, participation in any potential recovery does not require serving in that role.

1. Its ability to effectively manage channel inventory levels.
2. Its capacity to mitigate the financial impact of the termination of the Residential Clean Energy Credit under Section 25D of the Internal Revenue Code.
3. The resulting effect on the company’s financial outlook and operational performance, which investors claim was overstated.